Coal Girls Hit Pay Dirt

I am referring to a recent article in the Sunday Mail (Qld), titled “Coal Girls’ Hit Paydirt at Queensland’s Booming Mining Towns”, dated 6th November, 2011, by Kathleen Donaghey, Daryl Passmore and Jackie Sinnerton.

I take great offence from the undertone of this article and the supposed research being composed by Kerry Carrington.  I am a successful private independent sex worker and I, like the majority of sex workers, use condoms with all of my clients and conduct STI checks with every client (male and female).  I also have regular health checks for my own peace of mind even though it is not required of an independent sex worker in Queensland.

It is not the sex workers who are spreading disease, as articles like this insinuate.  The truth is that sex workers have led the way in STI prevention because we are self-regulating, our bodies are our business and it is part of sex work culture to use condoms.  We are not the reason there is an increase in STI’s in the mining towns or anywhere for that matter.  The increase is largely due to our young people between the ages of 15-24, who are choosing to have un-protected sex as par for the course.  There is little or no evidence that suggests that sex workers contribute to this debate either directly or indirectly.

I am more concerned with poorly researched, speculative media articles like this that paint a false, disgusting, negative image of sex workers as less than human, unclean and ignorant.  The language these journalists have used is highly emotive and bias.  Words like prostitute, hookers, privateers and unregulated all paint a slanderous picture of sex workers generally with no regard of the socio-political implications. Suggesting that our industry is unregulated and contributing to rising statistics in STI’s is blatant misrepresentation by researcher Kerry Carrington.  Ignorance breeds ignorance in this case.  Her research is already tainted and will hold no credibility.  Articles like this, directly contribute to the stigma sex workers deal with on a regular basis from the general public.

Since the passing of New Zealand’s Prostitution Reform Act 2003, Kiwi sex workers and their consenting clients, have enjoyed decriminalisation of the sex industry with all the perks and priviledges that go along with it.  Sex workers have the same benefits as any other sole trader or business owner.  By normalising the sex industry in this way, the profession is now safer, healthier and happier for everyone concerned.   By imposing differing and contradictory bogus rules and regulations from state to state, as Australia seems hell bent of doing, does little to improve the overall health, work and safety issues that are present in our industry.

If Australians agreed to decriminalise sex work and have one national policy,  then people (clients, workers and the public) would know where each other stands and take responsibility for playing their own parts.  The Police would be available to engage with sex workers and focus on investigations and complaints more openly where violent crime against women occurs (sex worker or not).  I’m sure sex workers would feel a lot more positive about providing information to police if we knew we were not going to be victimised or charged.

The government would be able to focus on sexual health issues like the ones raised here by continuing to adequately fund sexual health services, youth and other community organisations like RESPECT Inc, who support new and existing sex workers by providing education and distribution of condoms, so they can continue to practice their work safely.  I would like to see my hard earned tax dollars being invested positively in this way!

I digress, but my point has been made.  Haven’t you, the media,  got more pressing issues to worry about other than poking your nose into an industry that you obviously know nothing about and who are not prepared to research appropriately?  Furthermore, what are you actually trying to say by referencing how much money sex workers may or may not make? Many people earn good money working (sex work, mining or other).  Who cares?

A CEO can potentially earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, in order to reflect the nature of their job and the social and political pressures that go along with it.  Is sex work any less different?  Look at the personal, social, political and public pressures sex workers have to deal with on a daily basis, so aptly demonstrated by The Sunday Mail in the article in question.  Sex workers earn and deserve every cent they make and we are appreciated by our clients, despite the presence of whorephobic journalists.  I will continue to have my say on matters that affect and concern me, my colleagues, clients, friends and family.

It saddens me that there are people in journalism who have no regard for their profession and who clearly skipped the series of lectures on professional ethics, social justice and implications of getting it wrong.  It would have been more useful to raise the issues of the increase in reported STI’s by listing current research, evidence and statistics followed by some youth friendly tips, in an attempt to raise the awareness for young people about STI’s and condoms.  Now that would have made a positive statement.  As it stands, this article is embarrassing, offensive and degrading to sex workers and their clients.

Jx

© Copyright 2011, escortjodine.com.  All Rights Reserved

About Jezabel

Escort Jezabel - Exclusive Private Escort of Australia and New Zealand.
This entry was posted in Offensive Media Articles and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  1. Tis a Pity says:

    I can’t believe that it took three journos to write this completely biased inaccurate non-story. Especially as it just a rehash of earlier articles in other papers about fly in fly out sex workers in Western Australia.

    I agree that the article and the comments are biased and demeaning. Working girls put in inverted commas (cause everyone knows that sex work isn’t “real” work) then calling the workers hookers and privateers.

    Then we get the two well worn chestnuts that appear without any factual basis in all of this type of article. First that sex workers carry and spread disease and that an unregulated industry equals unsafe sex and thus even more carried and spread disease.

    As you rightly point out the actual facts are the opposite. Sex workers have lower STI rates than the general population and much higher safe sex compliance rates than the general population; in fact compliance rates that approach 100%.
    However “Sex Workers have Lower STI Rates than the General Population” doesn’t sell newspapers, whilst “Hookers Risk Violence and Transmit Disease to the (Innocent) Wives of Miners” does.

    And where do all these people in the comments section get the idea that we don’t pay tax ? Do they just assume (often incorrectly) that our earnings are all cash and therefore we don’t declare , because that’s what they would do if they had 100% cash incomes ? It really pisses me off that people automatically assume this, and it especially pisses me off every quarter when I am sending my tax payments off to the ATO.

  2. sam says:

    great article!! xx

  3. a whore says:

    What a great article! and thank you for enlightening us, Snowy, with more details of Kerry Carrington’s work

    yes the ‘research’ done by Carrington is not the slightest bit related to STI rates among sex workers, or contact tracing among miners, yet she decided to make ill informed comments, ie lie, about it in the media, in order to get the headline.

    Its whorephobic, and ignorant. THANKYOU Jodine for reviewing it! Keep it up!

  4. Snowy says:

    Hi Jodine
    Love your post. Re: Kerry Carrington and her comments. I’ve worked with her and all I can say is that she is a socio-path, is a bully and is delusional in her ability as a researcher. She surrounds herself with sicophants who pander to her needs and do the research for her. She then claims their work as her own. Ms Carrington has a long history of working in beauracracies/govt agences and in universities. My research shows that she does not have a long working history anywhere – anywhere. If there is a buck to be made then she will follow it with some sort of ‘dodgy’ research. And from my experience she is a pathological liar – another trait of the sociopath.
    Love your work.
    Snowy

    • Jodine says:

      Thank you Snowy. Her researching is alarming to say the least. There is no evidence that I can see. I am just appalled that an article like this one in question was even approved for publishing! So unprofessional. Journalistic standards are getting lower and lower every day. Sadly, the average GI Joe/Jane Blog’s is sucked right in to a false belief they believe is accurate and this just continues to breed ignorance. Jx

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *